Tuesday, May 15, 2007

sometimes it's a bit eerie how alcott's "radical educational experimentation" of the 1830s has been reinvented in contemporary composition theory as original and progressive. here he is on student writing "children have a great deal to contend with, in the attempt to express their thoughts. In the first place, they find it more difficult than better trained minds do, to preserve their thoughts in their memory; while the mechanical labor of holding the pen, of seeing to spelling, of pointing, and of all such details, interferes with the purely mental effort." yikes. it's sounds strikingly similar to the way in which we're taught to teach writing, and this is where, i suspect, i become a bit of a conservative. the mechanics, the grammar, the penning matter to me. i remember the feeling of utter liberation when i received a copy of strunk and white's elements of style during my senior year of high school. the rules, in other words, freed me. but more on grammar later. for now, it's time to write.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

shrunk and white, eh? Sounds like a t-shirt left in the dryer too long. not stylish.

Lost said...

And you still only "suspect" that you're a pedagogical conservative? Or maybe it's just a knee-jerk reaction on my part, but any embrace of that hated g-word as liberating or even a key of learning strikes me as old-school conservative pedagogy. (ahhh, memories of my first "F" in high school: soph. english grammar tests). But I am curious about liberation grammar. You've got some great ideas on this project!